Too many change programs don’t fully deliver due to lack of foundations – a clear and compelling reason for the change, understood and bought into.
Change management require a compelling change story, communicating it to employees and following it up with ongoing communications and involvement.
But in practice there are some pitfalls in achieving the desired impact.
There are two types of change stories consistently told in organizations. The first is the “good to great” story – something along the lines of:
Our historical advantage has been eroded by intense competition and changing customer needs – if we change, we can regain our leadership position.
The second is the turnaround story – typically a burning platform:
We’re performing below industry standard and must change dramatically to survive. We can become a top-quartile performer in our industry by exploiting our current assets and earning the right to grow.
These stories both seem intuitively rational, yet they too often fail to have the impact that management desire. Research by a number of leading thinkers in the social sciences has shown that when managers and employees are asked what motivates them the most in their work they are equally split among five forms of impact:
Management need to be able to tell a change story that covers all five things that motivate employees. In doing so, they can unleash tremendous amounts of energy that would otherwise remain latent in the organization.
But before leaders can get buy-in, people need to feel the problem. People aren’t going to consider anything until they are convinced there is a problem that truly needs to be addressed.
Short URL & title:
Change management require a compelling story — https://www.torbenrick.eu/t/r/btr
If you enjoyed this article, please take 5 seconds to share it on your social network. Thanks!
Change management is obsolete - Change management is broken - Change management isn't applicable anymore.…