Has lack of employee engagement become the norm

Has lack of employee engagement become the norm

Has lack of employee engagement become the norm

Has lack of employee engagement among employees become the norm rather than the exception? That question may already have been answered.

The vast majority of the German workforce is not engaged with its work. According to Gallup 86% percent of German employees are “not engaged” or “actively disengaged” in their work, meaning they are emotionally disconnected from their workplaces and are less likely to be productive. That leaves 14% of of German employees who are “engaged,” or involved in and enthusiastic about their work and contributing to their organizations in a positive manner.

The United States has an advantage over Germany in the percentage of engaged and not engaged employees: 29% of American employees are engaged, and 51% are not engaged – a difference of 15 percentage points compared to Germany’s engagement levels.

Engaged Not engaged Actively disengaged
American 29% 51% 20%
German 14% 63% 23%

Because engagement links to bottom-line business outcomes, German companies operate at a competitive disadvantage, particularly compared to countries with higher productivity and lower salary costs.

Obviously, there are areas of concern for Germany, but it’s probably not German employees’ fault. The problem with engagement can be attributed to a lack of leadership at work:

My boss is really good professionally . . . but leading employees is absolutely not his cup of tea

Neither is he aware of the strengths of each individual on our team, nor does he communicate [with] or involve us.

Maximum performance is not possible like that. All this frustrates me. If I would get a job offer today, I would be gone just like that, even though I really like working for this company because it sells good products (said a survey respondent)

From the Gallup survey in 2011:

Die Ursachen für den relativ geringen Anteil emotional hoch gebundener Arbeitnehmer in Deutschland hausgemacht und gehen auf Defizite in der Personalführung zurück. Es wird deutlich, welchen Einfluss das Führungsverhalten, also die Erfüllung der elementaren Bedürfnisse und Erwartungen am Arbeitsplatz, auf die Verbundenheit der Mitarbeiter hat.

The reasons for low engagement on a personal level are dissatisfaction with supervisors, a feeling that what they do does not matter, and a lack of recognition for a job well done.

My boss acts according to the motto: If you don’t scold, that’s praise enough. Why am I putting in an effort and giving all I have?  I wish he would recognize and appreciate my achievements. I have never heard him say something along the lines of ‘Great work you did there (said a survey respondent)

Managers who prioritize employee recognition understand the power of recognition. They know that employee recognition is not just a nice thing to do for people. Employee recognition is a communication tool that reinforces and rewards the most important outcomes people create for your business.

When you recognize people effectively, you reinforce, with your chosen means of recognition, the actions and behaviors you most want to see people repeat. Employees feel cared about and appreciated. It may seem simplistic, but people who feel recognized and cared about produce more and better work.

Need more inspiration who to improve employee engagement and performance: 20 tips to improve employee engagement

Short URL & title:
Has lack of employee engagement become the norm — http://www.torbenrick.eu/t/r/hps

Share it:
If you enjoyed this article, please take 5 seconds to share it on your social network. Thanks!

About The Author

Torben Rick

Experienced senior executive, both at a strategic and operational level, with strong track record in developing, driving and managing business improvement, development and change management. International experience from management positions in Denmark, Germany and Switzerland.

Blog Comments

I believe that lack of engagement has been the norm. That is because the vast majority of bosses use the traditional top-down command and control approach to managing people, an approach which by its nature tends to demotivate and demoralize employees.
 
Causing employees to choose to become engaged requires management to meet the five basic needs of employees at a reasonably high level. At the highest level, my own management experience indicates that employees become over 300% more productive than if poorly engaged and they literally love to come to work. So how engaged or disengaged employees are is a direct result of how they are treated by management.
 
Best regards, Ben

Add a comment

*Please complete all fields correctly

Related Post

Most shared leadership resources – Most shared post
Posted by Torben Rick | October 1, 2017
Top 70+ most shared leadership resources – Top shared posts
Most shared change management, digitization, disruption, organizational culture, performance management and strategy. Top shared posts.
No news is good news is not a management philosophy
Posted by Torben Rick | April 26, 2017
No news is good news is not a management philosophy
The lack of recognition takes a terrible toll on morale, productivity and ultimately profitability. No news is good news is not a management philosophy.
Change is changing - Riding the wave of change
Posted by Torben Rick | March 20, 2017
Change is changing – Riding the wave of change
Change is changing - The challenges of a VUCA world. The world is getting more dynamic and complex so leaders must learn how to surmount new challenges.

Send this to a friend